CO129-326 - Foreign Office - 1904 — Page 225

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

CONFIDENTIAL.

[April 20,]

SECTION 1.

223

Sir,

No. 1.

Board of Trade to Foreign Office.-(Received April 20.)

Board of Trade, April 19, 1904.

I AM directed by the Board of Trade to refer to your letter of the 2nd ultimo, transmitting a copy of a despatch from the Commercial Attaché to His Majesty's Legation at Peking, inclosing a copy of a despatch addressed by him to His Majesty's Minister, respecting certain proposed regulations to govern the registration of trade marks in China, and, in reply, I am to state, for the information of Lord Lansdowne, that the Board prefer the wording of Rule 6 suggested by Mr. Jamieson.

The operation of the rule should, however, be confined to marks resembling marks already registered "in respect of the same class of goods."

I am, &c. (Signed) T. W. P. BLOMEFIELD.

Page 223

[1932 --1]

23 & 4 (190~13989-20726-118

ext subsequent Pe

8.40.

1845

Page 223

Edit History

2026-06-02 04:51:56 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
CONFIDENTIAL. [April 20,] SECTION 1. 223 Sir, No. 1. Board of Trade to Foreign Office.-(Received April 20.) Board of Trade, April 19, 1904. I AM directed by the Board of Trade to refer to your letter of the 2nd ultimo, transmitting a copy of a despatch from the Commercial Attaché to His Majesty's Legation at Peking, inclosing a copy of a despatch addressed by him to His Majesty's Minister, respecting certain proposed regulations to govern the registration of trade marks in China, and, in reply, I am to state, for the information of Lord Lansdowne, that the Board prefer the wording of Rule 6 suggested by Mr. Jamieson. The operation of the rule should, however, be confined to marks resembling marks already registered "in respect of the same class of goods." I am, &c. (Signed) T. W. P. BLOMEFIELD. Page 223 [1932 --1] 23 & 4 (190~13989-20726-118 ext subsequent Pe 8.40. 1845 Page 223
Baseline (Original)
salz CHINA TRADE. CONFIDENTIAL. [April 20,] SECTION 1. 223 Sir, No. 1. Board of Trade to Foreign Office.-(Received April 20.) Board of Trade, April 19, 1904. I AM directed by the Board of Trade to refer to your letter of the 2nd ultimo, transmitting a copy of a despatch from the Commercial Attaché to His Majesty's Legation at Peking, inclosing a copy of a despatch addressed by bin to His Majesty's Minister, respecting certain proposed regulations to govern the registration of trade marks in China, and, in reply, I am to state, for the information of Lord Lansdowne, that the Board prefer the wording of Rule 6 suggested by Mr. Jaunieson. The operation of the rule should, however, be confined to marks resembling marks already registered "in respect of the same class of goods." I am, &c. (Signed) T. W. P. BLOMEFIELD. [1932 --1] 23 & 4 (190~13989-20726-118 ext subsequent Pe 8.40. 1845
2026-06-02 04:51:56 · Baseline
View content

salz

CHINA TRADE.

CONFIDENTIAL.

[April 20,]

SECTION 1.

223

Sir,

No. 1.

Board of Trade to Foreign Office.-(Received April 20.)

Board of Trade, April 19, 1904.

I AM directed by the Board of Trade to refer to your letter of the 2nd ultimo, transmitting a copy of a despatch from the Commercial Attaché to His Majesty's Legation at Peking, inclosing a copy of a despatch addressed by bin to His Majesty's Minister, respecting certain proposed regulations to govern the registration of trade marks in China, and, in reply, I am to state, for the information of Lord Lansdowne, that the Board prefer the wording of Rule 6 suggested by Mr. Jaunieson.

The operation of the rule should, however, be confined to marks resembling marks already registered "in respect of the same class of goods."

I am, &c. (Signed) T. W. P. BLOMEFIELD.

[1932 --1]

23 & 4 (190~13989-20726-118

ext subsequent Pe

8.40.

1845

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.